| Title |
Matching of numerical symbols with number of responses by pigeons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, May 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s100710050048 |
| Authors |
L. Xia, M. Siemann, J. D. Delius |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#502,260
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#133
of 1,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250
of 40,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them