↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events Associated With Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
23 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
300 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
31 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
342 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
523 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events Associated With Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2016
DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.9400
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suetonia C. Palmer, Dimitris Mavridis, Antonio Nicolucci, David W. Johnson, Marcello Tonelli, Jonathan C. Craig, Jasjot Maggo, Vanessa Gray, Giorgia De Berardis, Marinella Ruospo, Patrizia Natale, Valeria Saglimbene, Sunil V. Badve, Yeoungjee Cho, Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette, Michael Burke, Labib Faruque, Anita Lloyd, Nasreen Ahmad, Yuanchen Liu, Sophanny Tiv, Natasha Wiebe, Giovanni F. M. Strippoli

Abstract

Numerous glucose-lowering drugs are used to treat type 2 diabetes. To estimate the relative efficacy and safety associated with glucose-lowering drugs including insulin. Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases through March 21, 2016. Randomized clinical trials of 24 weeks' or longer duration. Random-effects network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) level, treatment failure (rescue treatment or lack of efficacy), hypoglycemia, and body weight. A total of 301 clinical trials (1 417 367 patient-months) were included; 177 trials (56 598 patients) of drugs given as monotherapy; 109 trials (53 030 patients) of drugs added to metformin (dual therapy); and 29 trials (10 598 patients) of drugs added to metformin and sulfonylurea (triple therapy). There were no significant differences in associations between any drug class as monotherapy, dual therapy, or triple therapy with odds of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Compared with metformin, sulfonylurea (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.18 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.34]), thiazolidinedione (SMD, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.00 to 0.31]), DPP-4 inhibitor (SMD, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.52]), and α-glucosidase inhibitor (SMD, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.58]) monotherapy were associated with higher HbA1C levels. Sulfonylurea (odds ratio [OR], 3.13 [95% CI, 2.39 to 4.12]; risk difference [RD], 10% [95% CI, 7% to 13%]) and basal insulin (OR, 17.9 [95% CI, 1.97 to 162]; RD, 10% [95% CI, 0.08% to 20%]) were associated with greatest odds of hypoglycemia. When added to metformin, drugs were associated with similar HbA1C levels, while SGLT-2 inhibitors offered the lowest odds of hypoglycemia (OR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.08 to 0.18]; RD, -22% [-27% to -18%]). When added to metformin and sulfonylurea, GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with the lowest odds of hypoglycemia (OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.94]; RD, -10% [95% CI, -18% to -2%]). Among adults with type 2 diabetes, there were no significant differences in the associations between any of 9 available classes of glucose-lowering drugs (alone or in combination) and the risk of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Metformin was associated with lower or no significant difference in HbA1C levels compared with any other drug classes. All drugs were estimated to be effective when added to metformin. These findings are consistent with American Diabetes Association recommendations for using metformin monotherapy as initial treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes and selection of additional therapies based on patient-specific considerations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 300 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 523 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 516 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 13%
Student > Master 62 12%
Student > Bachelor 53 10%
Other 45 9%
Student > Postgraduate 41 8%
Other 124 24%
Unknown 129 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 229 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 44 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Other 31 6%
Unknown 156 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 393. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#78,590
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,405
of 36,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,682
of 378,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#36
of 432 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 432 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.