↓ Skip to main content

YB-1 binds to CAUC motifs and stimulates exon inclusion by enhancing the recruitment of U2AF to weak polypyrimidine tracts

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
YB-1 binds to CAUC motifs and stimulates exon inclusion by enhancing the recruitment of U2AF to weak polypyrimidine tracts
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, June 2012
DOI 10.1093/nar/gks579
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Juan Wei, Shi-Rong Mu, Monika Heiner, Xing Fu, Li-Juan Cao, Xiu-Feng Gong, Albrecht Bindereif, Jingyi Hui

Abstract

The human Y box-binding protein-1 (YB-1) is a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)/ribonucleic acid (RNA)-binding protein with pleiotropic functions. Besides its roles in the regulation of transcription and translation, several recent studies indicate that YB-1 is a spliceosome-associated protein and is involved in alternative splicing, but the underlying mechanism has remained elusive. Here, we define both CAUC and CACC as high-affinity binding motifs for YB-1 by systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) and demonstrate that these newly defined motifs function as splicing enhancers. Interestingly, on the endogenous CD44 gene, YB-1 appears to mediate a network interaction to activate exon v5 inclusion via multiple CAUC motifs in both the alternative exon and its upstream polypyrimidine tract. We provide evidence that YB-1 activates splicing by facilitating the recruitment of U2AF65 to weak polypyrimidine tracts through direct protein-protein interactions. Together, these findings suggest a vital role of YB-1 in activating a subset of weak 3' splice sites in mammalian cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 27%
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#25,156
of 27,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,596
of 177,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#202
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.