↓ Skip to main content

Medication reconciliation: passing phase or real need?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Medication reconciliation: passing phase or real need?
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11096-012-9707-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Durán-García, Cecilia M. Fernandez-Llamazares, Miguel A. Calleja-Hernández

Abstract

Medication reconciliation errors occur across transitions in patient care. Of all medication errors in a hospital, 25 % in hospitalised patients are caused by a failure to reconcile new prescriptions with ongoing home treatments. These errors are more common at discharge, but the critical moment for detecting and resolving them is at the time of admission. This commentary reviews the different ways in which reconciliation errors can be prevented. The reconciliation process should be standardised and implemented in daily practice as a routine part of healthcare provision. To achieve this, professional development of hospital pharmacists is of paramount importance. The commentary goes on to describe the factors that affect the reconciliation process and the stages involved in its implementation. Finally, we discuss the use of information technology as a means to help integrating medication reconciliation into clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Ireland 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,607,238
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#725
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,370
of 172,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.