↓ Skip to main content

Eric Williams and William Forbes: copper, colonial markets, and commercial capitalism†

Overview of attention for article published in Economic History Review, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eric Williams and William Forbes: copper, colonial markets, and commercial capitalism†
Published in
Economic History Review, January 2021
DOI 10.1111/ehr.13050
Authors

Nuala Zahedieh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 21%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,649,566
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Economic History Review
#277
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,223
of 525,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic History Review
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.