↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Association Study of Coronary Heart Disease and Its Risk Factors in 8,090 African Americans: The NHLBI CARe Project

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
282 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Wide Association Study of Coronary Heart Disease and Its Risk Factors in 8,090 African Americans: The NHLBI CARe Project
Published in
PLoS Genetics, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001300
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Lettre, Cameron D. Palmer, Taylor Young, Kenechi G. Ejebe, Hooman Allayee, Emelia J. Benjamin, Franklyn Bennett, Donald W. Bowden, Aravinda Chakravarti, Al Dreisbach, Deborah N. Farlow, Aaron R. Folsom, Myriam Fornage, Terrence Forrester, Ervin Fox, Christopher A. Haiman, Jaana Hartiala, Tamara B. Harris, Stanley L. Hazen, Susan R. Heckbert, Brian E. Henderson, Joel N. Hirschhorn, Brendan J. Keating, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, Emma Larkin, Mingyao Li, Megan E. Rudock, Colin A. McKenzie, James B. Meigs, Yang A. Meng, Tom H. Mosley, Anne B. Newman, Christopher H. Newton-Cheh, Dina N. Paltoo, George J. Papanicolaou, Nick Patterson, Wendy S. Post, Bruce M. Psaty, Atif N. Qasim, Liming Qu, Daniel J. Rader, Susan Redline, Muredach P. Reilly, Alexander P. Reiner, Stephen S. Rich, Jerome I. Rotter, Yongmei Liu, Peter Shrader, David S. Siscovick, W. H. Wilson Tang, Herman A. Taylor, Russell P. Tracy, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Kevin M. Waters, Rainford Wilks, James G. Wilson, Richard R. Fabsitz, Stacey B. Gabriel, Sekar Kathiresan, Eric Boerwinkle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
France 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 235 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 20%
Student > Master 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Other 16 6%
Other 46 18%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 16%
Computer Science 6 2%
Mathematics 6 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 37 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2012.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#3,178
of 9,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,469
of 199,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#21
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.