| Title |
What Circumstances Prompt a Workplace Discussion in Medical Evaluations for Back Pain?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10926-012-9392-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William S. Shaw, Edward H. Chin, Candace C. Nelson, Silje Endresen Reme, Mary J. Woiszwillo, Santosh K. Verma |
| Abstract |
To determine how frequently workplace topics emerge in the interactions between patients and providers in an evaluation for low back pain (LBP) and to determine its association with patient and provider characteristics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 16% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#575
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,458
of 172,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.