| Title |
Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00406-016-0715-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Leucht, Anna Chaimani, Andrea S. Cipriani, John M. Davis, Toshi A. Furukawa, Georgia Salanti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 26% |
| Canada | 4 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
| Scientists | 9 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 24% |
| Psychology | 10 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,175,471
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#63
of 1,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,356
of 372,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.