↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Management Guidelines on Peyronie's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sexual Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-Based Management Guidelines on Peyronie's Disease
Published in
Journal of Sexual Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Chung, David Ralph, Ates Kagioglu, Guilio Garaffa, Ahmed Shamsodini, Trinity Bivalacqua, Sidney Glina, Lawrence Hakim, Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad, Gregory Broderick

Abstract

Despite recent advances in our knowledge and treatment strategies in Peyronie's Disease (PD), much remained unknown about this disease. To provide a clinical framework and key guideline statements to assist clinicians in an evidence-based management of PD. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify published literature relevant to PD. The search included all relevant articles published up to June 2015, including preclinical studies and published guidelines. References used in the text were assessed according to their level of evidence, and guideline recommendations were graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Owing to the paucity of larger series and randomized placebo-controlled trials with regard to surgical intervention, guideline statements are provided as clinical principle or expert opinion. This literature was discussed at a panel meeting, and selected articles with the highest evidence available were used to create consensus guideline statements for the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine guidelines on PD. In addition to existing Third International Consultation on Sexual Medicine guidelines on PD, seven new summary recommendations were created. A greater understanding of the scientific basis of PD is greatly needed to address our understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical epidemiology, psychosocial, and diagnostic assessment as well as treatment strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 34 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 45 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,443,044
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sexual Medicine
#1,514
of 3,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,866
of 353,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sexual Medicine
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.