↓ Skip to main content

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with Anbainuo, a novel recombinant human TNFRII:Fc fusion protein, plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or…

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with Anbainuo, a novel recombinant human TNFRII:Fc fusion protein, plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or Anbainuo alone in Chinese patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10067-012-2096-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao-Xiang Chen, Qing Dai, An-Bin Huang, Hua-Xiang Wu, Dong-Bao Zhao, Xing-Fu Li, Shao-Xian Hu, Nan-Ping Yang, Yi Tao, Jian-Hua Xu, Lin-Di Jiang, Chun-De Bao

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological efficacy as well as safety profiles of Anbainuo, a recombinant human TNFRII:Fc fusion protein, combined with methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX alone or Anbainuo alone in the treatment of Chinese patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this 24-week, multicenter, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study, 396 RA patients were randomized into combination therapy group (Anbainuo plus MTX), Anbainuo group, or MTX group. Clinical response was assessed using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-N, ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and van der Heijde modification of Sharp score, among which ACR-N and ACR20 were defined as primary major endpoints. After 24 weeks of treatment, the ACR-N in the combination therapy group (12.79 ± 9.24 %) was significantly higher than that in Anbainuo group (9.56 ± 11.16 %) and in MTX group (5.08 ± 11.1 %) (p = 0.00 and p = 0.00, respectively). Patients in Anbainuo group had significantly higher ACR-N than those in MTX group (p = 0.02). More patients in the combination therapy group (53.6 %) achieved ACR50 improvement response than those in the MTX group (30.8 %). ACR70 of combination therapy group (27.7 %) was significantly higher than that of Anbainuo group (15.8 %) and MTX group (7.70 %), with no significant difference between Anbainuo group and MTX group. DAS28-ESR in the combination therapy group was significantly reduced compared to either monotherapy groups. Moreover, DAS28-ESR was significantly lower in Anbainou group than in MTX group. The combination therapy group also showed significantly less radiographic progression than the MTX group (p = 0.03). The total adverse events (AE) in the combination group (40.9 %) was significantly higher than those in the MTX group (28.8 %) (p < 0.05). Anbainuo combined with MTX therapy can effectively control the disease activity and radiographic progression of RA, while the incidence of AE also increased compared to either Anbainuo or MTX.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 23%