| Title |
Absorbability of calcium sources: The limited role of solubility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Calcified Tissue International, May 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02563819 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert P. Heaney, Robert R. Recker, Connie M. Weaver |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,872,944
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#129
of 1,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#354
of 16,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them