↓ Skip to main content

CYP3A7*1C allele: linking premenopausal oestrone and progesterone levels with risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CYP3A7*1C allele: linking premenopausal oestrone and progesterone levels with risk of hormone receptor-positive breast cancers
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, January 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41416-020-01185-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nichola Johnson, Sarah Maguire, Anna Morra, Pooja Middha Kapoor, Katarzyna Tomczyk, Michael E. Jones, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Clare Gilham, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Thomas U. Ahearn, Irene L. Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Natalia N. Antonenkova, Volker Arndt, Kristan J. Aronson, Annelie Augustinsson, Caroline Baynes, Laura E. Beane Freeman, Matthias W. Beckmann, Javier Benitez, Marina Bermisheva, Carl Blomqvist, Bram Boeckx, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Stig E. Bojesen, Hiltrud Brauch, Hermann Brenner, Barbara Burwinkel, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Jose E. Castelao, Stephen J. Chanock, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Christine L. Clarke, Don M. Conroy, Fergus J. Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Kamila Czene, Thilo Dörk, A. Heather Eliassen, Christoph Engel, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine Figueroa, Giuseppe Floris, Henrik Flyger, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Susan M. Gapstur, Montserrat García-Closas, Mia M. Gaudet, Graham G. Giles, Mark S. Goldberg, Anna González-Neira, Pascal Guénel, Eric Hahnen, Christopher A. Haiman, Niclas Håkansson, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Patricia A. Harrington, Steven N. Hart, Maartje J. Hooning, John L. Hopper, Anthony Howell, David J. Hunter, Agnes Jager, Anna Jakubowska, Esther M. John, Rudolf Kaaks, Renske Keeman, Elza Khusnutdinova, Cari M. Kitahara, Veli-Matti Kosma, Stella Koutros, Peter Kraft, Vessela N. Kristensen, Allison W. Kurian, Diether Lambrechts, Loic Le Marchand, Martha Linet, Jan Lubiński, Arto Mannermaa, Siranoush Manoukian, Sara Margolin, John W. M. Martens, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Rebecca Mayes, Alfons Meindl, Roger L. Milne, Susan L. Neuhausen, Heli Nevanlinna, William G. Newman, Sune F. Nielsen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Nadia Obi, Andrew F. Olshan, Janet E. Olson, Håkan Olsson, Ester Orban, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Paolo Peterlongo, Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska, Katri Pylkäs, Gad Rennert, Hedy S. Rennert, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Emmanouil Saloustros, Dale P. Sandler, Elinor J. Sawyer, Rita K. Schmutzler, Christopher Scott, Xiao-Ou Shu, Jacques Simard, Snezhana Smichkoska, Christof Sohn, Melissa C. Southey, John J. Spinelli, Jennifer Stone, Rulla M. Tamimi, Jack A. Taylor, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Ian Tomlinson, Melissa A. Troester, Thérèse Truong, Celine M. Vachon, Elke M. van Veen, Sophia S. Wang, Clarice R. Weinberg, Camilla Wendt, Hans Wildiers, Robert Winqvist, Alicja Wolk, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Alison M. Dunning, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Douglas F. Easton, A. Forbes Howie, Julian Peto, Isabel dos-Santos-Silva, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Jenny Chang-Claude, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Nick Orr, Olivia Fletcher

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Master 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 31 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 30 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,377,229
of 31,684,203 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#5,996
of 12,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,476
of 559,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#30
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,684,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 559,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.