Title |
Dystrophin restoration therapy improves both the reduced excitability and the force drop induced by lengthening contractions in dystrophic mdx skeletal muscle
|
---|---|
Published in |
Skeletal Muscle, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13395-016-0096-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pauline Roy, Fredérique Rau, Julien Ochala, Julien Messéant, Bodvael Fraysse, Jeanne Lainé, Onnik Agbulut, Gillian Butler-Browne, Denis Furling, Arnaud Ferry |
Abstract |
The greater susceptibility to contraction-induced skeletal muscle injury (fragility) is an important dystrophic feature and tool for testing preclinic dystrophin-based therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. However, how these therapies reduce the muscle fragility is not clear. To address this question, we first determined the event(s) of the excitation-contraction cycle which is/are altered following lengthening (eccentric) contractions in the mdx muscle. We found that the immediate force drop following lengthening contractions, a widely used measure of muscle fragility, was associated with reduced muscle excitability. Moreover, the force drop can be mimicked by an experimental reduction in muscle excitation of uninjured muscle. Furthermore, the force drop was not related to major neuromuscular transmission failure, excitation-contraction uncoupling, and myofibrillar impairment. Secondly, and importantly, the re-expression of functional truncated dystrophin in the muscle of mdx mice using an exon skipping strategy partially prevented the reductions in both force drop and muscle excitability following lengthening contractions. We demonstrated for the first time that (i) the increased susceptibility to contraction-induced muscle injury in mdx mice is mainly attributable to reduced muscle excitability; (ii) dystrophin-based therapy improves fragility of the dystrophic skeletal muscle by preventing reduction in muscle excitability. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Taiwan | 1 | 8% |
Denmark | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 18% |
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 18% |
Sports and Recreations | 7 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 34% |