| Title |
Differences in Patient-Reported Experiences of Care by Race and Acculturation Status
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10903-012-9728-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Memoona Hasnain, Alan Schwartz, Jorge Girotti, Angela Bixby, Luis Rivera, and the UIC Experiences of Care Project Group |
| Abstract |
Patient-reported experiences of care are an important focus in health disparities research. This study explored the association of patient-reported experiences of care with race and acculturation status in a primary care setting. 881 adult patients (African-American 34%; Hispanic--classified as unacculturated or biculturated--31%; Caucasian 33%; missing race 2%), in outpatient Family Medicine clinics, completed a written survey in Spanish or English. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician & Group (CAG) Survey Adult Primary Care instrument was used for experiences of care and Short Form-12 survey for health status. Controlling for other variables, race and acculturation were significantly associated with several CAG subscales. Hispanic patients gave significantly higher ratings for care experiences and expressed greater interest in shared decision making. Selected patient-reported measures of care are associated with patients' race and acculturation status (for Hispanic patients). We discuss implications for both provision and measurement of quality care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2013.
All research outputs
#1,973,713
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#84
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,026
of 174,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.