↓ Skip to main content

Low Energy Availability in Exercising Women: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Low Energy Availability in Exercising Women: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions
Published in
Sports Medicine, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0583-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Slater, Rachel Brown, Rebecca McLay-Cooke, Katherine Black

Abstract

Research on the health of female athletes has developed substantially over the past 50 years. This review aims to provide an overview of this research and identify directions for future work. While early cross-sectional studies focused primarily on menstruation, research has progressed to now encompass hormonal changes, bone health and lipid profiles. The seminal work of Loucks and colleagues distinguished that these health concerns were due to low energy availability (LEA) rather than exercise alone. LEA occurs when the body has insufficient energy available to meet the needs of training and normal physiological functioning. While there appears to be agreement that LEA is the underlying cause of this syndrome, controversy regarding terminology has emerged. Originally coined the female athlete triad (Triad), some researchers are now advocating the use of the term relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S). This group argues that the term Triad excludes male athletes who also have the potential to experience LEA and its associated negative impact on health and performance. At present, implications of LEA among male athletes are poorly understood and should form the basis of future research. Other directions for future research include determination of the prevalence and long-term risks of LEA in junior and developmental athletes, and the development of standardised tools to diagnose LEA. These tools are required to aid comparisons between studies and to develop treatment strategies to attenuate the long-term health consequences of LEA. Continued advances in knowledge on LEA and its associated health consequences will aid development of more effective prevention, early detection and treatment strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 169 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 51 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 36 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 56 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,420,045
of 24,601,689 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,143
of 2,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,106
of 370,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#27
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,601,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.