↓ Skip to main content

Does physical activity modify the risk of obesity for type 2 diabetes: a review of epidemiological data

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Does physical activity modify the risk of obesity for type 2 diabetes: a review of epidemiological data
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10654-009-9395-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Qin, Mirjam J. Knol, Eva Corpeleijn, Ronald P. Stolk

Abstract

Obesity and physical inactivity are both risk factors for type 2 diabetes. Since they are strongly associated, it has been suggested that they might interact. In this study, we summarized the evidence on this interaction by conducting a systematic review. Two types of interaction have been discerned, statistical and biological interaction, which could give different results. Therefore, we calculated both types of interaction for the studies in our review. Cohort studies, published between 1999 and 2008, that investigated the effects of obesity and physical activity on the risk of type 2 diabetes were included. We calculated both biological and statistical interaction in these studies. Eight studies were included of which five were suitable to calculate interaction. All studies showed positive biological interaction, meaning that the joint effect was more than the sum of the individual effects. However, there was inconsistent statistical interaction; in some studies the joint effect was more than the product of the individual effects, in other studies it was less. The results show that obesity and physical inactivity interact on an additive scale. This means that prevention of either obesity or physical inactivity, not only reduces the risk of diabetes by taking away the independent effect of this factor, but also by preventing the cases that were caused by the interaction between both factors. Furthermore, this review clearly showed that results can differ depending on what method is used to assess interaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 171 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 51 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Sports and Recreations 10 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 57 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,746,548
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#1,461
of 1,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,261
of 107,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.