| Title |
The Effects of Religiosity on Ethical Judgments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-011-1009-4 |
| Authors |
Alan G. Walker, James W. Smither, Jason DeBode |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 19% |
| Unknown | 60 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 111 | 43% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 22 | 8% |
| Psychology | 15 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 67 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#751,052
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#110
of 2,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,020
of 124,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.