↓ Skip to main content

A demographic approach to study effects of climate change in desert plants

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A demographic approach to study effects of climate change in desert plants
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2012
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Salguero-Gómez, Wolfgang Siewert, Brenda B. Casper, Katja Tielbörger

Abstract

Desert species respond strongly to infrequent, intense pulses of precipitation. Consequently, indigenous flora has developed a rich repertoire of life-history strategies to deal with fluctuations in resource availability. Examinations of how future climate change will affect the biota often forecast negative impacts, but these-usually correlative-approaches overlook precipitation variation because they are based on averages. Here, we provide an overview of how variable precipitation affects perennial and annual desert plants, and then implement an innovative, mechanistic approach to examine the effects of precipitation on populations of two desert plant species. This approach couples robust climatic projections, including variable precipitation, with stochastic, stage-structured models constructed from long-term demographic datasets of the short-lived Cryptantha flava in the Colorado Plateau Desert (USA) and the annual Carrichtera annua in the Negev Desert (Israel). Our results highlight these populations' potential to buffer future stochastic precipitation. Population growth rates in both species increased under future conditions: wetter, longer growing seasons for Cryptantha and drier years for Carrichtera. We determined that such changes are primarily due to survival and size changes for Cryptantha and the role of seed bank for Carrichtera. Our work suggests that desert plants, and thus the resources they provide, might be more resilient to climate change than previously thought.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 216 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 25%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Master 16 7%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 47%
Environmental Science 52 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 46 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#6,576
of 7,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,102
of 285,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#55
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.