↓ Skip to main content

Price–quality relationship in the presence of asymmetric dynamic reference quality effects

Overview of attention for article published in Marketing Letters, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Price–quality relationship in the presence of asymmetric dynamic reference quality effects
Published in
Marketing Letters, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11002-011-9143-4
Authors

Arieh Gavious, Oded Lowengart

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nepal 2 5%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Professor 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 19 43%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 16%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,486,178
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Marketing Letters
#104
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,237
of 124,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marketing Letters
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them