↓ Skip to main content

Social relation-based dynamic team organization by context-aware matchmaking

Overview of attention for article published in Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Social relation-based dynamic team organization by context-aware matchmaking
Published in
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00779-012-0608-0
Authors

Keonsoo Lee, Jaehoon Kim, Seungmin Rho, Hangbae Chang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 70%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
#1,089
of 1,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,370
of 171,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
#33
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.