↓ Skip to main content

Laboratory Maintenance and Culture of Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the Fungus That Causes Bat White‐Nose Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Current Protocols, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laboratory Maintenance and Culture of Pseudogymnoascus destructans, the Fungus That Causes Bat White‐Nose Syndrome
Published in
Current Protocols, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/cpz1.23
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Blehert, Jeffrey M. Lorch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Linguistics 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Decision Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,994,649
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Current Protocols
#370
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,844
of 525,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Protocols
#33
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.