↓ Skip to main content

Emerging Strategies for Healthy Urban Governance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Emerging Strategies for Healthy Urban Governance
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11524-007-9174-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Burris, Trevor Hancock, Vivian Lin, Andre Herzog

Abstract

Urban health promotion is not simply a matter of the right interventions, or even the necessary resources. Urban (and indeed global) health depends to an important extent on governance, the institutions and processes through which societies manage the course of events. This paper describes the concept of governance, distinguishing between reforms aimed at improving how government works and innovations that more fundamentally reinvent governance by developing new institutions and processes of local stakeholder control. The paper highlights strategies urban governors can use to maximize their influence on the national and international decisions that structure urban life. It concludes with some observations on the limitations of local governance strategies and the importance of establishing a "virtuous circuit" of governance through which urban dwellers play a greater role in the formation and implementation of policy at the national and global levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 112 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Lecturer 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Engineering 7 6%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,147,383
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#460
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,975
of 72,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.