| Title |
Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Policy Sciences, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11077-012-9160-z |
| Authors |
Lauren Richie, J. Daniel Oppenheimer, Susan G. Clark |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 17% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 34 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#424
of 430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,010
of 163,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.