↓ Skip to main content

Scoring Firms’ Codes of Ethics: An Explorative Study of Quality Drivers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Scoring Firms’ Codes of Ethics: An Explorative Study of Quality Drivers
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10551-013-1968-8
Authors

Giovanni Maria Garegnani, Emilia Piera Merlotti, Angeloantonio Russo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 52 45%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 31 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,336,031
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,827
of 2,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,224
of 302,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#34
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.