↓ Skip to main content

Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. II. Mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, November 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
789 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. II. Mechanisms
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, November 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00054304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristi A. Steinmetz, John D. Potter

Abstract

The epidemiologic literature on the relationship between vegetable and fruit consumption and human cancer at a variety of sites was reviewed systematically in Part I. It was concluded that consumption of higher levels of vegetables and fruit is associated consistently, although not universally, with a reduced risk of cancer at most sites, and particularly with epithelial cancers of the alimentary and respiratory tracts. Possible mechanisms by which vegetable and fruit intake might alter risk of cancer are addressed here. A large number of potentially anticarcinogenic agents are found in these food sources, including carotenoids, vitamins C and E, selenium, dietary fiber, dithiolthiones, glucosinolates and indoles, isothiocyanates, flavonoids, phenols, protease inhibitors, plant sterols, allium compounds, and limonene. These agents have both complementary and overlapping mechanisms of action, including the induction of detoxification enzymes, inhibition of nitrosamine formation, provision of substrate for formation of antineoplastic agents, dilution and binding of carcinogens in the digestive tract, alteration of hormone metabolism, antioxidant effects, and others. It appears extremely unlikely that any one substance is responsible for all the associations seen. Possible adverse effects of vegetable and fruit consumption are also examined. One way to consider the relationships reviewed here is to hypothesize that humans are adapted to a high intake of plant foods that supply substances crucial to the maintenance of the organism, but only some of which are currently called 'essential nutrients.' Cancer may be the result of reducing the level of intake of foods that are metabolically necessary--it may be a disease of maladaptation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 170 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 52 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 57 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,892,739
of 25,191,684 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#194
of 2,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333
of 17,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,191,684 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them