| Title |
CEO Gender, Ethical Leadership, and Accounting Conservatism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-013-2044-0 |
| Authors |
Simon S. M. Ho, Annie Yuansha Li, Kinsun Tam, Feida Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 617 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 616 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 80 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 51 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 96 | 16% |
| Unknown | 223 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 227 | 37% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 70 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 6% |
| Psychology | 15 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 27 | 4% |
| Unknown | 231 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,952,112
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#503
of 2,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,498
of 305,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.