↓ Skip to main content

Small group discussionはオンラインで代替可能か?

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Small group discussionはオンラインで代替可能か?
Published in
Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, July 2021
DOI 10.24489/jjphe.2020-059
Authors

上田 昌宏, 安原 智久, 串畑 太郎, 栗尾 和佐子, 曽根 知道

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,374,336
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
#16
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,697
of 455,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them