↓ Skip to main content

Wealth Creation in China and Some Lessons for Development Ethics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Wealth Creation in China and Some Lessons for Development Ethics
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0453-x
Authors

Georges Enderle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Lecturer 5 17%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 15 52%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,486,178
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,184
of 2,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,687
of 93,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.