↓ Skip to main content

Culture-independent methods for studying environmental microorganisms: methods, application, and perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
556 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Culture-independent methods for studying environmental microorganisms: methods, application, and perspective
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00253-011-3800-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Can Su, Liping Lei, Yanqing Duan, Ke-Qin Zhang, Jinkui Yang

Abstract

Since the application of molecular methods, culture-independent methods (CIMs) have been developed to study microbial communities from various environments. In the past 20 years, several methods based on the direct amplification and analyses of the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene have been developed to directly study environmental microorganisms. These methods include denaturing/temperature gradient gel electrophoresis, single-strand-conformation polymorphism, restriction fragment length polymorphism, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Similarly, non-PCR-based molecular techniques, such as microarray and fluorescence in situ hybridization have also been adopted. In recent years, several novel fields of investigation such as metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, and single-cell genomics were developed, largely propelled by the innovation and application of next-generation sequencing methods. Several single-cell-based technologies such as Raman microspectroscopy and nano-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry are also increasingly used in the fields of microbial ecology and environmental microbiology. The application of these methods has revolutionized microbiology by allowing scientists to directly analyze natural microbial communities in situ, including their genes, transcripts, proteins, and metabolites and how their interactions impact their distribution patterns. In this review, we present an up-to-date review on different CIMs and their applications, our focuses are on the comparison of different CIMs and their application in the analyses of microbial diversities and communities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 8 1%
United States 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 519 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 19%
Researcher 86 15%
Student > Master 80 14%
Student > Bachelor 70 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 7%
Other 87 16%
Unknown 88 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 200 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 15%
Environmental Science 64 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 5%
Engineering 15 3%
Other 51 9%
Unknown 118 21%