| Title |
The cost effectiveness of a telephone-based pharmacy advisory service to improve adherence to newly prescribed medicines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11096-007-9134-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel A. Elliott, Nick Barber, Sarah Clifford, Robert Horne, Elaine Hartley |
| Abstract |
This "proof of concept" study aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of pharmacists giving advice via telephone, to patients receiving a new medicine for a chronic condition, in England. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 291 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 14% |
| Researcher | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 19% |
| Unknown | 68 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 41 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 8% |
| Psychology | 21 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 82 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,655,358
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#116
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,051
of 82,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.