| Title |
Pathological Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-015-4404-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia Cortazar, Charles E. Geyer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,952,112
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#821
of 6,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,630
of 256,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#10
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.