| Title |
Midurethral sling incision: indications and outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-012-1895-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Volker Viereck, Oliver Rautenberg, Jacek Kociszewski, Susanne Grothey, JoEllen Welter, Jakob Eberhard |
| Abstract |
Controversy continues over the effectiveness of sling incision, which is the most common operative approach to treating complications following suburethral sling insertion. This retrospective analysis assessed the indications for sling incision and patient outcomes regarding resolution of complications and stress urinary incontinence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 21% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,302,619
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#692
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,218
of 184,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.