↓ Skip to main content

歴史認識における因果と確率

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy (Tetsugaku), April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 174)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
歴史認識における因果と確率
Published in
Philosophy (Tetsugaku), April 2005
DOI 10.11439/philosophy1952.2005.42
Authors

一ノ瀬 正樹

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy (Tetsugaku)
#19
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,458
of 74,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy (Tetsugaku)
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them