You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Behavioral consequences at 5 y of neonatal iron deficiency in a low-risk maternal–infant cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa367 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine K McCarthy, Deirdre M Murray, Jonathan O B Hourihane, Louise C Kenny, Alan D Irvine, Mairead E Kiely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 11 | 58% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 37% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,393,320
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3,757
of 12,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,421
of 454,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#41
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.