You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions correlate to specific gray matter volumes in treatment-naïve patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Psychiatric Research, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro G. Alvarenga, Maria C. do Rosário, Marcelo C. Batistuzzo, Juliana B. Diniz, Roseli G. Shavitt, Fábio L.S. Duran, Darin D. Dougherty, Rodrigo A. Bressan, Eurípedes C. Miguel, Marcelo Q. Hoexter |
| Abstract |
Clinical and sociodemographic findings have supported that OCD is heterogeneous and composed of multiple potentially overlapping and stable symptom dimensions. Previous neuroimaging investigations have correlated different patterns of OCD dimension scores and gray matter (GM) volumes. Despite their relevant contribution, some methodological limitations, such as patient's previous medication intake, may have contributed to inconsistent findings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#3,164
of 3,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,358
of 191,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.