↓ Skip to main content

Anatomy of the long head of biceps femoris: An ultrasound study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Anatomy, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anatomy of the long head of biceps femoris: An ultrasound study
Published in
Clinical Anatomy, June 2016
DOI 10.1002/ca.22718
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Tosovic, J.C. Muirhead, J.M.M. Brown, S.J. Woodley

Abstract

Hamstring strains, particularly involving biceps femoris long head (BFlh) at the proximal musculotendinous junction (MTJ), are commonly experienced by athletes. With the use of diagnostic ultrasound increasing, an in-depth knowledge of normal ultrasonographic anatomy is fundamental to better understanding hamstring strain. This study aimed to describe the architecture of BFlh, using ultrasonography, in young men and cadaver specimens. BFlh morphology was examined in 19 healthy male participants (mean age 21.6 years) using ultrasound. Muscle, tendon and MTJ lengths were recorded and architectural parameters assessed at four standardised points along the muscle. Measurement accuracy was validated by ultrasound and dissection of BFlh in six male cadaver lower limbs (mean age 76 years). Intra-rater reliability of architectural parameters was examined for repeat scans, image analysis and dissection measurements. Distally the BFlh muscle had significantly (p<0.05) shorter fascicles and larger pennation angles than proximal sites. Agreement between ultrasound and dissection (cadaver study) was excellent for all architectural parameters, except pennation angle (PA), and MTJ length. All other measures demonstrated good-excellent repeatability. BFlh is not uniform in architecture when imaged using ultrasound. It is likely that its distal most segment is better suited for force production in comparison to the more proximal segments, which show excursive potential, traits which possibly contribute to the high rate of injury at the proximal MTJ. The data presented in this study provide specific knowledge of the normal ultrasonographic anatomy of BFlh, which should be of assistance in analysing BFlh injury via imaging. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Master 16 13%
Other 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 36 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Unspecified 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 39 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,521,509
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Anatomy
#132
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,411
of 359,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Anatomy
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.