↓ Skip to main content

Utility of S100B Serum Level for the Determination of Concussion in Male Rugby Players

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Utility of S100B Serum Level for the Determination of Concussion in Male Rugby Players
Published in
Sports Medicine, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0579-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Damien Bouvier, Thomas Duret, Mathieu Abbot, Thibault Stiernon, Bruno Pereira, Aurélien Coste, Jean Chazal, Vincent Sapin

Abstract

The incidence of concussion in professional direct-contact sports, particularly in rugby, has increased in recent years. To date, cognitive assessment is the most common means of determining whether a concussed player can return to the game. Serum S100B assay, an objective blood test known to be useful in brain injury management, may offer a novel additional approach to the management of concussed male rugby players. The aim of this study was to investigate the S100B utility for the determination of concussion in a professional 15-players-a-side rugby team. Thirty-nine male rugby players were included in a prospective study during the 2014-2015 French championship season. Serum sampling was carried out several times at baseline and after a match and/or a concussion, at set times (2, 36 h). Serum S100B concentrations were determined using chemiluminescence immunoassay on a Roche Diagnostics(®) instrument. The players' basal serum S100B was stable during the season and was not correlated with anthropometric data, body composition, or creatine kinase concentration. A significant increase in S100B concentration within 2 h after a game (without concussion) was observed. This increase was correlated with the number of body collisions during a match. Seventy-seven assays were performed 36 h after a game, including the follow-up of five concussed players. Thirty-six hours after a match, an increase of a minimum of 20 % compared with individual basal concentrations identified concussion with 100 % sensitivity and 81 % specificity. S100B measured 36 h after a match is thus a discriminating test to identify concussion in a male rugby player, with a 100 % negative predictive value.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 39 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Sports and Recreations 8 8%
Psychology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 47 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,436,766
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,860
of 2,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,458
of 363,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#40
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.