↓ Skip to main content

Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography
Published in
European Radiology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00330-012-2649-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gisella Gennaro, R. Edward Hendrick, Patricia Ruppel, Roberta Chersevani, Cosimo di Maggio, Manuela La Grassa, Luigi Pescarini, Ilaria Polico, Alessandro Proietti, Enrica Baldan, Elisabetta Bezzon, Fabio Pomerri, Pier Carlo Muzzio

Abstract

To determine the performance of combined single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view cranio-caudal (CC) mammography (MX) compared with that of standard two-view digital mammography.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 30%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 32%
Physics and Astronomy 7 14%
Engineering 6 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,627,259
of 23,905,714 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,148
of 4,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,709
of 170,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,905,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.