↓ Skip to main content

Relationship of Incision Choice to Capsular Contracture

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Relationship of Incision Choice to Capsular Contracture
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00266-007-9061-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas C. Wiener

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Other 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,336,031
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#1,000
of 1,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,262
of 77,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.