↓ Skip to main content

Invasive Spartina: lessons and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Invasive Spartina: lessons and challenges
Published in
Biological Invasions, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10530-016-1201-7
Authors

Malika Ainouche, Alan Gray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 50%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,811,358
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#2,028
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,180
of 355,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#40
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.