↓ Skip to main content

浅草文庫旧蔵「蘭書」の行方 記録・史料による追跡

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Society for Archival Science, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
浅草文庫旧蔵「蘭書」の行方 記録・史料による追跡
Published in
Journal of the Japan Society for Archival Science, June 2016
DOI 10.32239/archivalscience.24.0_30
Authors

安江 明夫

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,805,826
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Society for Archival Science
#4
of 14 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,372
of 353,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Society for Archival Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them