↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of complement lectin pathway activation and resistance by trypanosomatid parasites

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Immunology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of complement lectin pathway activation and resistance by trypanosomatid parasites
Published in
Molecular Immunology, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.08.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Igor Cestari, Ingrid Evans-Osses, Luregn J. Schlapbach, Iara de Messias-Reason, Marcel I. Ramirez

Abstract

Studies in the past decade have demonstrated a crucial role for the complement lectin pathway in host defence against protozoan microbes. Recognition of pathogen surface molecules by mannan-binding lectin and ficolins revealed new mechanisms of innate immune defence and a diversity of parasite strategies of immune evasion. In the present review, we will discuss the current knowledge of: (1) the molecular mechanism of lectin pathway activation by trypanosomes; (2) the mechanisms of complement evasion by trypanosomes; and (3) host genetic deficiencies of complement lectin pathway factors that contribute to infection susceptibility and disease progression. This review will focus on trypanosomatids, the parasites that cause Chagas disease, leishmaniasis and sleeping sickness (African trypanosomiasis).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Immunology
#2,686
of 3,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,191
of 191,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Immunology
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,884 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.