↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of interpreters in supporting the transition from oncology to palliative care: A qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiences of interpreters in supporting the transition from oncology to palliative care: A qualitative study
Published in
Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2016
DOI 10.1111/ajco.12563
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Kirby, Alex Broom, Phillip Good, Vanessa Bowden, Zarnie Lwin

Abstract

Medical consultations focused on managing the transition to palliative care are interpersonally challenging and require high levels of communicative competence. In the context of non-English speaking patients, communication challenges are further complicated due to the requirement of interpreting; a process with the potential to add intense layers of complexity in the clinical encounter, such as misunderstanding, misrepresentation and power imbalances. The aim of the study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of professional interpreters in supporting the transition of culturally and linguistically diverse patients to specialist palliative care. Qualitative, semistructured interviews with 20 professional interpreters working in oncology and palliative care settings in two metropolitan hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Four key themes emerged from the thematic analysis: the challenges of translating the meaning of "palliative care"; managing interpreting in the presence of family care-givers; communicating and expressing sensitivity while remaining professional and interpreters' own emotional burden of difficult clinic encounters between doctor and patient negotiations. The results suggest that interpreters face a range of often concealed interpersonal and interprofessional challenges and recognition of such dynamics will help provide necessary support for these key stakeholders in the transition to palliative care. Enriched understanding of interpreters' experiences has clinical implications on improving how health professionals interact and work with interpreters in this sensitive setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 22 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 26 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
#104
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,784
of 377,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.