↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tubular, lactating, and ductal adenomas are devoid of MED12 Exon2 mutations, and ductal adenomas show recurrent mutations in GNAS and the PI3K–AKT pathway
Published in
Genes, Chromosomes, and Cancer, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/gcc.22396
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Adenomas of the breast are rare benign tumors although single cases with malignant behavior have been reported. However, the genetic basis of these tumors is unknown. Employing targeted next generation sequencing of 50 cancer-related genes as well as Sanger sequencing, we profiled a cohort of 18 mammary adenomas comprising 9 ductal, 6 tubular, and 3 lactating adenoma. Missense mutations were detected in 8 of the 18 cases (44%). Specifically, five (56%) ductal adenomas and three (50%) tubular adenomas harbored mutated genes. No mutations were detected in lactating adenomas. Three of the nine ductal adenomas showed mutant AKT1 (p.E17K) with two of them harboring an additional GNAS mutation (p.R201C). One case had mutant PIK3CA (p.H1047R) and another case a mutation in GNAS (p.R201C). The three cases of mutated tubular adenomas showed mutations in either MET or FGFR3. Of note, we did not detect copy number changes and none of the cases including tubular adenomas had mutations in exon 2 of MED12. Our results suggest that ductal adenomas are related to papillomas of the breast and screening for mutations in exon 2 of MED12 might help to facilitate differential diagnosis between tubular adenoma and fibroadenoma in difficult cases. Lastly, our data exemplarily demonstrate that mutations in cancer-related genes per se do not indicate malignancy but occur in benign tumors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 15%
Professor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2016.
All research outputs
#31,376,233
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Genes, Chromosomes, and Cancer
#1,747
of 1,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,162
of 335,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes, Chromosomes, and Cancer
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,871 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.