↓ Skip to main content

Long‐term outcomes of thoracic transplant recipients following conversion to everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor in a multicenter, open‐label, randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Transplant International, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long‐term outcomes of thoracic transplant recipients following conversion to everolimus with reduced calcineurin inhibitor in a multicenter, open‐label, randomized trial
Published in
Transplant International, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/tri.12783
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars Gullestad, Hans Eiskjaer, Finn Gustafsson, Gerdt C Riise, Kristjan Karason, Göran Dellgren, Göran Rådegran, Lennart Hansson, Einar Gude, Øystein Bjørtuft, Kjell Jansson, Hans Henrik Schultz, Dag Solbu, Martin Iversen

Abstract

The NOCTET study randomized 282 patients ≥1 year after heart or lung transplantation to continue conventional calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy or to start everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI. Last follow-up, at ≥5 years post-randomization (mean 5.6 years) was attended by 72/140 everolimus patients (51.4%) and 91/142 controls (64.1%). Mean measured GFR remained stable in the everolimus group from randomization (51.3mL/min) to last visit (51.4mL/min) but decreased in controls (from 50.5mL/min to 45.3mL/min), and was significantly higher with everolimus at last follow-up (p=0.004). The least squares mean (SE) change from randomization was -1.5 (1.7)mL/min with everolimus versus -7.2 (1.7)mL/min for controls (difference 5.7 [95% CI 1.7; 9.6]mL/min; p=0.006). The difference was accounted for by heart transplant patients (difference 6.9 [95% 2.3; 11.5]mL/min; p=0.004). Lung transplant patients showed no between-group difference at last follow-up. Rates of rejection, death and major cardiac events were similar between groups, as was graft function. Pneumonia was more frequent with everolimus (18.3% versus 6.4%). In conclusion, introducing everolimus in maintenance heart transplant patients, with reduced CNI, achieves a significant improvement in renal function which is maintained for at least five years, but an early renal benefit in lung transplant patients was lost. Long-term immunosuppressive efficacy was maintained. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 26 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,204,873
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Transplant International
#436
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,230
of 352,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplant International
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.