You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neuropilin 1 deficiency on CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells impairs mouse melanoma growth
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1084/jem.20111497 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wiebke Hansen, Marina Hutzler, Simone Abel, Christina Alter, Christian Stockmann, Stefanie Kliche, Juliane Albert, Tim Sparwasser, Shimon Sakaguchi, Astrid M. Westendorf, Dirk Schadendorf, Jan Buer, Iris Helfrich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 3 | 1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 205 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 56 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
Professor | 12 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 16% |
Unknown | 33 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 34% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 37 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 10% |
Chemistry | 5 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 5% |
Unknown | 39 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,137,023
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#2,252
of 11,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,234
of 195,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.