↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review evaluating the impact of post-registration nursing and midwifery education on practice

Overview of attention for article published in Nurse Education in Practice, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review evaluating the impact of post-registration nursing and midwifery education on practice
Published in
Nurse Education in Practice, April 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.nepr.2009.03.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harry Gijbels, Rhona O’Connell, Caroline Dalton-O’Connor, Moira O’Donovan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Lecturer 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Social Sciences 16 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nurse Education in Practice
#625
of 1,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,789
of 106,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nurse Education in Practice
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.