↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Obesity in the Workplace: a Review of Contributing Factors, Consequences and Potential Solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Impact of Obesity in the Workplace: a Review of Contributing Factors, Consequences and Potential Solutions
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13679-016-0227-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nipun Shrestha, Zeljko Pedisic, Sarah Neil-Sztramko, Katriina T. Kukkonen-Harjula, Veerle Hermans

Abstract

This narrative review summarized findings from previous reviews and the most recently published studies, regarding the following: (1) the association between two occupational risk factors-shift work and sedentary work-and obesity, (2) the effects of obesity on workplace productivity and (3) the effectiveness of workplace interventions aimed at preventing or reducing obesity. Despite some inconsistencies in findings, there is convincing evidence that shift work increases the risk of obesity, while most studies did not show a significant association between sedentary work and obesity. Overweight and obesity were found to be associated with absenteeism, disability pension and overall work impairment, whilst evidence of their relationship with presenteeism, unemployment and early retirement was not consistent. Due to the vast heterogeneity in the types of workplace-based interventions to prevent or treat obesity, no sound conclusions can as yet be drawn about their overall effectiveness and best practice recommendations for their implementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 42 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Sports and Recreations 13 8%
Psychology 8 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,425,033
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#140
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,947
of 383,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.