↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 240

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 1: Alkyl Mercury-Induced Toxicity: Multiple Mechanisms of Action
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 192)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
42 X users
facebook
16 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Alkyl Mercury-Induced Toxicity: Multiple Mechanisms of Action
Chapter number 1
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 240
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/398_2016_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-942299-2, 978-3-31-942300-5
Authors

Risher, John F, Tucker, Pamela, John F. Risher, Pamela Tucker, Risher, John F.

Editors

Pim de Voogt

Abstract

There are a number of mechanisms by which alkylmercury compounds cause toxic action in the body. Collectively, published studies reveal that there are some similarities between the mechanisms of the toxic action of the mono-alkyl mercury compounds methylmercury (MeHg) and ethylmercury (EtHg). This paper represents a summary of some of the studies regarding these mechanisms of action in order to facilitate the understanding of the many varied effects of alkylmercurials in the human body. The similarities in mechanisms of toxicity for MeHg and EtHg are presented and compared. The difference in manifested toxicity of MeHg and EtHg are likely the result of the differences in exposure, metabolism, and elimination from the body, rather than differences in mechanisms of action between the two.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 33%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#409,875
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#6
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,568
of 319,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.