↓ Skip to main content

The Materials Commons: A Collaboration Platform and Information Repository for the Global Materials Community

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
The Materials Commons: A Collaboration Platform and Information Repository for the Global Materials Community
Published in
JOM, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11837-016-1998-7
Authors

Brian Puchala, Glenn Tarcea, Emmanuelle. A. Marquis, Margaret Hedstrom, H. V. Jagadish, John E. Allison

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 28 38%
Engineering 9 12%
Computer Science 5 7%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2016.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#1,358
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,338
of 359,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.